Weaving our narrative: perspectives from hijab-wearing learners in the operating room
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36834/aysxvt02Abstract
Background: Hijab-wearing healthcare practitioners and learners endorse that hijab is important to their identity. However, in the operating room (OR), they have reported experiencing negative emotions and lacking personal protective equipment (PPE) for their hijab. Guidelines for PPE for hijabs are institution-specific, and uptake can be inconsistent. As Canadian medical schools diversify, hijab-wearing learners’ (HWLs) unique barriers to OR participation and surgical career planning become increasingly pressing for establishing equity and inclusion in surgical specialties. Our study aims to characterize OR experiences of medical students and residents who trained in Canadian ORs, impacts on career planning, and potential solutions for perceived barriers to participation in the OR and surgical career planning.
Methods: We conducted semi-structured interviews with ten hijab-wearing medical students and residents who trained in Kingston Health Sciences Centre (KHSC) ORs. We analyzed the data using an essentialist, experiential, inductive approach where we generated codes and subsequently themes based on the participants’ descriptions of OR experiences. We used Reflexive Thematic Analysis (TA) to consider the surface qualities and the hidden or inferred meanings of participants’ words based on our team members’ subjectivity as minoritized medical learners.
Results: We identified four themes: (1) The lack of OR attire standardization indicated a lack of institutional commitment to inclusivity; (2) There was conflict between identities as medical students and hijab-wearing women, with pressure to fit in by uncomfortably modifying the hijab; (3) Negative experiences related to wearing the hijab in the OR deterred learners from pursuing surgical careers; and (4) Solutions included provision of disposable and reusable hijabs and improved cultural education for OR staff. An infographic on PPE for hijabs should include definitions of hijab and be widely distributed.
Conclusions: Hijab-wearing learners face barriers to participating in the OR. Addressing these challenges requires accessible PPE for hijabs and widespread educational resources to support these learners.
References
1. Malik A, Qureshi H, Abdul-Razakq H, et al. ‘I decided not to go into surgery due to dress code’: a cross-sectional study within the UK investigating experiences of female Muslim medical health professionals on bare below the elbows (BBE) policy and wearing headscarves (hijabs) in theatre. BMJ Open. 2019 Mar;9(3):e019954. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019954
2. Khatun R, Saleh Z, Adnan S, Boukerche F, Cooper A. Covered, but not sterile: reflections on being a hijabi in medicine and surgery. Ann Surg. 2021 Mar;273(3):e83–4. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000004655
3. Hussain W, Hussain H, Hussain M, Hussain S, Attar S. Approaching the Muslim orthopaedic patient. J Bone Joint Surg. 2010 Jul 7;92(7):e2. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.J.00065
4. Litchmore RVH, Safdar S. Meanings of the hijab: views of Canadian Muslim women. Asian J Soc Psychol. 2016 Jul;19(3):198–208. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajsp.12141
5. Masood A. Doing gender, modestly: conceptualizing workplace experiences of Pakistani women doctors. Gend Work Organ. 2019 Mar;26(2):214–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12308
6. Reeves TC, McKinney AP, Azam L. Muslim women’s workplace experiences: implications for strategic diversity initiatives. Equal Divers Incl Int J. 2012 Dec 28;32(1):49–67. https://doi.org/10.1108/02610151311305614
7. Leyerzapf H, Rifi H, Abma T, Verdonk P. Veiled ambitions: female Muslim medical students and their ‘different’ experiences in medical education. In: Crul M, Dick L, Ghorashi H, Valenzuela A Jr, editors. Scholarly engagement and decolonisation: views from South Africa, the Netherlands and the United States. 1st ed. African Sun Media; 2020. p. 187–213. Available from: https://bit.ly/2BiMR1B https://doi.org/10.18820/9781928314578/07. [Accessed on Jul 30, 2025].
8. Mehrabi S, Rimawi A, El-Ghazali A, et al. The operating room and learning environment for US-based Muslim women in medicine. J Surg Educ. 2025 Mar;82(3):103399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2024.103399
9. Abdelwahab RM, Bostwick JM. Medical practice should not require the stripping away of one’s self. Mayo Clin Proc. 2022 Sep;97(9):1605–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocp.2021.12.019
10. Abdelwahab R, Bostwick JM. Religious coverings in the OR and ICU: unveiling the need for updates in medical education. Acad Med. 2022 Dec;97(12):1785. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000004957
11. Abdulwadood I, Ishimoto AK. Covered in the operating room: carving out space for my hijab. Acad Med. 2024 Jun;99(6):e2. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000005495
12. Borrero M, Kiel L, Abuali I, Ivy ZK, Florez N. The weaponization of professionalism against physicians of color. Hum Resour Health. 2024 Jul 16;22(1):52. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12960-024-00931-y
13. Abdelwahab R, Aden A, Bearden B, Sada A, Bostwick JM. Cheat sheet and summary for a multicultural guide to the operating room and ICU. J Am Coll Surg. 2022 May;234(5):971–2. https://doi.org/10.1097/XCS.0000000000000081
14. British Islamic Medical Association. Bare below the elbows toolkit. 2017. Available from: https://britishima.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/toolkit_hijab_web_6june17.pdf [Accessed on Jul 27, 2026].
15. Loyola University Health System. Operating room attire.; 2018. Available from: https://www.stritch.luc.edu/lumen/meded/surgery/homepage/operatingroomattire.pdf. [Accessed on DATE].
16. Wood A. Clinical issues: personnel wearing hijabs in the OR. AORN J. 2015 Oct;102(4):441–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aorn.2015.07.001
17. Islam N, Bohnen J, Richardson L, Najeeb U. Standards for religious attire for health care workers, learners and volunteers in hospital areas with sterile procedures (ASP). Toronto Academic Health Science Network; 2022. Available from: https://meded.temertymedicine.utoronto.ca/sites/default/files/inline-files/TAHSN%20Sterile%20procedure%20area%20religious%20attire%20standards%20-%202022-06-16.pdf. [Accessed on DATE].
18. Ahmed SM, Hawn MT. Steps to a culturally conscious workspace in the modern surgical era. J Am Coll Surg. 2021 Aug;233(2):327–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2021.05.006
19. Soegaard Ballester JM, Han JJ, Yong CM. Addressing functional biases in procedural environments. Ann Surg. 2022 Mar;275(3):e544–6. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000005211
20. Rendle KA, Abramson CM, Garrett SB, Halley M, Dohan D. Beyond exploratory: a tailored framework for designing and assessing qualitative health research. BMJ Open. 2019 Aug;9:e030123. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030123
21. Kallio H, Pietilä AM, Johnson M, Kangasniemi M. Systematic methodological review: developing a framework for a qualitative semi-structured interview guide. J Adv Nurs. 2016 May;72(12):2954–65. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.13031
22. CaRMS. Program descriptions - first iteration. Available from: https://www.carms.ca/match/r-1-main-residency-match/program-descriptions/. [Accessed on Mar 5, 2026].
23. Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006 Jan;3(2):77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
24. Byrne D. A worked example of Braun and Clarke’s approach to reflexive thematic analysis. Qual Quant. 2022 Jun;56(3):1391–412. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-021-01182-y
25. Braun V, Clarke V. One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis? Qual Res Psychol. 2021 Jul 3;18(3):328–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238
26. Braun V, Clarke V, Hayfield N. ‘A starting point for your journey, not a map’: Nikki Hayfield in conversation with Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke about thematic analysis. Qual Res Psychol. 2022 Apr 3;19(2):424–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2019.1670765
27. Volpe RL, Hopkins M, Geathers J, et al. Negotiating professional identity formation in medicine as an ‘outsider’: the experience of professionalization for minoritized medical students. SSM Qual Res Health. 2021 Dec;1:100017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmqr.2021.100017
28. Volpe RL, Geathers J, Loeffler M, et al. “It creates a divide”: minoritized medical students’ perceptions of professional identity formation. Educ Health. 2024 Jul 30;37(2):2. https://doi.org/10.62694/efh.2024.13
29. Moula Z, Zanting A, Kumar S. ‘I sound different, I look different, I am different’: protecting and promoting the sense of authenticity of ethnically minoritized medical students. Clin Teach. 2024;21(4):e13750. https://doi.org/10.1111/tct.13750
30. Schneidman J, Rice K, Armstrong N. Women in surgery: the social construction of gender in surgical practice. Am J Surg. 2025 Apr;116343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2025.116343
31. City of Toronto. Update on the City of Toronto’s response to the World Sikh Organization of Canada’s complaint against contracted security guard companies. 2022 Jul 5 Available from: https://www.toronto.ca/news/update-on-the-city-of-torontos-response-to-the-world-sikh-organization-of-canadas-complaint-against-contracted-security-guard-companies/. [Accessed on Mar 5, 2026].
32. Bhatia DDS, Bhatia KS, Saluja T, et al. Under-mask beard covers achieve an adequate seal with tight-fitting disposable respirators using quantitative fit testing. J Hosp Infect. 2022 Oct;128:8–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2022.05.015
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Jasmine Ng, Henna Salim, Jaskarn Dhaliwal, Ayesha Shakeel, Suffia Malik, Eleftheria Laios, Nancy Dalgarno, Wiley Chung

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Submission of an original manuscript to the Canadian Medical Education Journal will be taken to mean that it represents original work not previously published, that it is not being considered elsewhere for publication. If accepted for publication, it will be published online and it will not be published elsewhere in the same form, for commercial purposes, in any language, without the consent of the publisher.
Authors who publish in the Canadian Medical Education Journal agree to release their articles under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 Canada Licence. This licence allows anyone to copy and distribute the article for non-commercial purposes provided that appropriate attribution is given. For details of the rights an author grants users of their work, please see the licence summary and the full licence.


