From advocacy to integration: a systems-based roadmap for sustainable simulation-based medical education in resource-constrained settings
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36834/c64gsy46Abstract
Medical education in many low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), including Ghana, remains heavily dependent on didactic instruction and opportunistic patient exposure. While this model has historically produced capable clinicians, the increasing complexity, acuity, and risk profile of modern healthcare demand a shift toward demonstrable, performance-based competence. Growing evidence documents significant rates of preventable adverse events in LMIC health systems, underscoring the urgency of producing graduates with verified, performance-based competency. Simulation-Based Medical Education (SBME) provides a structured, safe, and repeatable environment for deliberate practice, yet its integration across LMIC training systems remains limited, with uptake constrained by pedagogical capacity deficits, infrastructure misconceptions, and policy inertia.
This paper argues that SBME is not merely an educational enhancement, but a systems-level reform required to bridge the persistent ‘knowing-doing’ gap in clinical training. Using Ghana as a representative LMIC context, I analyze systemic barriers to adoption - including deficits in simulation pedagogy expertise, misconceptions regarding infrastructure cost, and cultural skepticism toward simulation’s legitimacy – and propose an integrated, multi-layered model for national SBME adoption. This model comprises three interdependent system layers – Human Capital Development, Context-Adaptive Infrastructure, and Curriculum & Policy Integration – each of which corresponds directly to the stages of a five-step strategic roadmap running from conceptual advocacy through to quality assurance and policy mandate.
This system's roadmap demonstrates how countries with constrained resources can adopt scalable, pedagogically sound SBME models that improve learner competence, strengthen health system resilience, and ultimately enhance patient safety.
References
ullan F, Frehywot S, Omaswa F, et al. Medical schools in sub-Saharan Africa. Lancet. 2011;377(9771):1113–1121. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61961-7
2. Ofori-Adjei D. Changing landscape of public health and medical education curriculum. Ghana Med J. 2018;52(3):115. https://doi.org/10.4314/gmj.v52i3.1
3. Gonzalo JD, Dekhtyar M, Starr SR, et al. Health systems science curricula in undergraduate medical education: identifying and defining a potential curricular framework. Acad Med. 2017;92(1):123–131. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000001177
4. Frenk J, Chen L, Bhutta ZA, et al. Health professionals for a new century: transforming education to strengthen health systems in an interdependent world. Lancet. 2010;376(9756):1923–1958. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61854-5
5. Rosen MA, DiazGranados D, Dietz AS, et al. Teamwork in healthcare: key discoveries enabling safer, high-quality care. Am Psychol. 2018;73(4):433–450. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000298
6. Gaba DM. The future vision of simulation in health care. Qual Saf Health Care. 2004;13(Suppl 1):i2–i10. https://doi.org/10.1136/qshc.2004.009878
7. Cook DA, Hatala R, Brydges R, et al. Technology-enhanced simulation for health professions education. JAMA. 2011;306(9):978–988. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2011.1234
8. McGaghie WC, Issenberg SB, Cohen ER, Barsuk JH, Wayne DB. Does simulation-based medical education with deliberate practice yield better results than traditional clinical education? A meta-analytic comparative review of the evidence. Acad Med. 2011;86(6):706–711. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e318217e119
9. Ferris HA, O’Flynn D. Assessment in medical education: what are we trying to achieve? Int J High Educ. 2015;4(2):139–148. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v4n2p139
10. Salifu DA, Heymans Y, Christmals CD. A simulation-based clinical nursing education framework for a low-resource setting: a multimethod study. Healthcare (Basel). 2022;10(9):1639. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10091639
11. Yardley S, Teunissen PW, Dornan T. Experiential learning: transforming theory into practice. Med Teach. 2012;34(2):161–164. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2012.643264
12. Zendejas B, Wang AT, Brydges R, Hamstra SJ, Cook DA. Cost: the missing outcome in simulation-based medical education research: a systematic review. Surgery. 2013;153(2):160–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2012.06.025
13. Roussin C, Sawyer T, Weinstock P. Assessing competency using simulation: the SIMZONES approach. BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn. 2019;6(5):262–267. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjstel-2019-000480
14. KJ DP, K R, DGSR KM, Reddy YN, SRA. Impact of simulation-based learning on knowledge and skills among medical students undergoing competency-based medical education. Cureus. 2025. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.88749
15. Holeman I, Kane D. Human-centered design for global health equity. Inf Technol Dev. 2020;26(3):477–505. https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2019.1667289
16. Rudolph JW, Simon R, Raemer DB, Eppich WJ. Debriefing as formative assessment: closing performance gaps in medical education. Acad Emerg Med. 2008;15(11):1010–1016. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1553-2712.2008.00248.x
17. Fanning RM, Gaba DM. The role of debriefing in simulation-based learning. Simul Healthc. 2007;2(2):115–125. https://doi.org/10.1097/SIH.0b013e3180315539
18. Weller JM, Nestel D, Marshall SD, Brooks PM, Conn JJ. Simulation in clinical teaching and learning. Med J Aust. 2012;196(9):594. https://doi.org/10.5694/mja10.11474
19. Soni L, Ramachandran R, Rewari V. Faculty development programmes in simulation-based teaching: an exploration of current practices. Indian J Anaesth. 2024;68(1):78–86. https://doi.org/10.4103/ija.ija_1248_23
20. Ismail FW, Ajani K, Baqir SM, et al. Challenges and opportunities in the uptake of simulation in healthcare education in the developing world: a scoping review. MedEdPublish. 2024;14:38. https://doi.org/10.12688/mep.20271.1
21. Alayande BT, Forbes C, Masimbi O, et al. The implementation of simulation-based learning for training undergraduate medical students in essential surgical care across Sub-Saharan Africa: a scoping review. Med Sci Educ. 2023;34(1):237–256. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-023-01898-6
22. Luaces MA, Cochran MS, Finocchario-Kessler S, et al. Impacts, learner diversity, and curricular framework of a virtual global health elective catalyzed by the COVID-19 pandemic. Ann Glob Health. 2023;89(1). https://doi.org/10.5334/aogh.4060
23. Rivas JA, Bartoletti J, Benett S, Strong Y, Novotny TE, Schultz ML. Paediatric trauma education in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic literature review. J Glob Health. 2022;12:04078. https://doi.org/10.7189/jogh.12.04078
24. Robinson SJA, Ritchie AMA, Pacilli M, et al. Simulation-based education of health workers in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review. Glob Health Sci Pract. 2024;12(6). https://doi.org/10.9745/ghsp-d-24-00187
25. Seethamraju RR, Stone KP, Shepherd M. Factors affecting implementation of simulation-based education after faculty training in a low-resource setting. Simul Healthc. 2022;17(1). https://doi.org/10.1097/SIH.0000000000000549
26. Abahuje E, Tuyishime E, Alayande BT. Global surgical simulation education: current practices and future directions. Surgery. 2025;180:109050. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2024.109050
27. Maboh MN, Biaka FN, Andoh MN. Training and implementation of simulation-based education in low-resource settings: nurse educators’ experience. Afr J Health Prof Educ. 2025;17(2). https://doi.org/10.7196/AJHPE.2025.v17i2.1004
28. Bajwa M, Najeeb F, Alnazzawi H, et al. A scoping review of Pakistani healthcare simulation: insights for lower-middle-income countries. Cureus. 2024. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.76485
29. Karageorgos S, Hibberd O, Ren D, Hornsby Y, Roland D, Koutroulis I. Training for pediatric sepsis – a medical education perspective and potential role of artificial intelligence. Children (Basel). 2025;12(11):1542. https://doi.org/10.3390/children12111542
30. McGaghie WC, Issenberg SB, Barsuk JH, Wayne DB. A critical review of simulation-based mastery learning with translational outcomes. Med Educ. 2014;48(4):375–385. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.12391
31. Del Castillo Miranda JC, Oweidat M, Abady E, et al. Enhancing pediatric emergency care in low-resource settings through simulation-based training: a narrative review. SAGE Open Med. 2025;12. https://doi.org/10.1177/30502225251319883
32. Najjuma J, Bajunirwe F, Mbalinda S, et al. Barriers and facilitators of simulation-based education in stroke nursing management at a regional referral hospital in southwestern Uganda: a qualitative study. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2025;16:1317–1329. https://doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S535086
33. Ahmed A, Ali FA. Advancing global nursing education through simulation-based learning: strengthening clinical competence and ensuring patient safety. ISA J Med Sci. 2025. Available from: https://isapublisher.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/Advancing-Global-Nursing-Education-through-Simulation-Based-Learning-Strengthening-Clinical-Competence-and-Ensuring-Patient-Safety.pdf
34. Chou WK, Ullah N, Arjomandi Rad A, et al. Simulation training for obstetric emergencies in low- and lower-middle income countries: a systematic review. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2022;276:74–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2022.07.003
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Dr. Nkechi Oluwakemi Dike
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Submission of an original manuscript to the Canadian Medical Education Journal will be taken to mean that it represents original work not previously published, that it is not being considered elsewhere for publication. If accepted for publication, it will be published online and it will not be published elsewhere in the same form, for commercial purposes, in any language, without the consent of the publisher.
Authors who publish in the Canadian Medical Education Journal agree to release their articles under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 Canada Licence. This licence allows anyone to copy and distribute the article for non-commercial purposes provided that appropriate attribution is given. For details of the rights an author grants users of their work, please see the licence summary and the full licence.
How to Cite
